Coyote Population Processes Revisited
نویسندگان
چکیده
It appears that coyote (Canrs latrans) abundance 1s determined pr~mal-~ly b avallabil~ty of food (prey) as mediated through social dominance h~erarchles and a telritol-ial land tenure system. This is reflected in rates of reproduction, dispersal, and mo~tality, with survival ofjuveniles a major factor Suggestions for a new gencrat~on of simulation niodels to explore coyote population funct~ons are included l'opulatio~i manipulation is a prominent component of many coyote management programs. Understand~ng the factors affecting animal abundance and the mechanisms of populat~on regulation can sss~st In recognizing the merits and liabilities associated w ~ t h such management approaches. In tuni, this should help identify more flexible management scenarios and result in management programs that are more selective, effect~ve and efliclent. Gier (1968) and Knowlton (1972) prov~ded some ln~tlal ~llforn~ation on coyote populat~on parameters. Additional info~~nat~on fr m a variety of authors lcad Knowlton and Stoddall (1983) to hypotlies~ze that coyote abundance was governed by interactions between ava~lable food (prey) and coyote behav~oral charactel-~st~cs, namely soc~al dominance and territoriality, with the impact expressed through the processes of reproduction, mortal~ty, ingress and egress. S~milar conclusions were reached by Packard and Mech (1983) to esplaln population regulation in grey \valves (C. Ilcpl~s). Hel.ein we revlew these ideas in I~glit of infornlat~on acquo-ed In recent years Evidence concerning footl abundance K~iowlton and Stoddart (1983) used 3 llnes of ev~dence to support the contention that food abundance was a major detelminant of coyote abundance, namely (I) state by state averages of the ~ndices of coyote abundance calculated from the Westwide Survey of Predator Abundance (1,lnhal-t and Knowlton 1975, Roughton and Swecny 1982), (2) a meager data set concelnlng coyote and rodent abundance on s~ tcs cattered throughout Texas, and (3) a 1 5-year time serles of coyote and jack]-abbit (Lepus cul,Sot~riicl~s) density est~mates In Curlew Valley, Utah Since the prevlous paper, the data set for the iirst has not changed and pnor ~nterpretations remain largcly Intact, I.e., mean coyote abundancc varies among the westcm states and appears to reflect pnrnruy productivity H~gher dens~ties occur in the Great Plains, a relat~ve scarcity typ~fies the mte~mou~ta~ii reglon, and moderate abundanccs are found among the states of the Pacific coast. In add~tlon, an Increasing kline In dens~ty from northern to southern states seems ev~dent This appears conslstent w~th observations by Weaver (1979) and Todd and Kcith (1 976) suggest~ng food suppl~es in wulter may be part~cularly important in areas where cond~t~ons are more harsh Gese (1995) identified available food resoul-ces in w~nter to be pa~ticularly ~rnpol-tant in replating size of coyote packs In Yellowstone National Park The second data set, conceinlng the relative abundance of coyotes and rodents on s~tes throughout Texas has not been elaborated and is unconvlnclng on ~ t s own Nowevcr, the results are conslstent w ~ t h other sources of information Slncc the earher paper, annual and semi-annual density est~mates for coyotes and jackrabb~ts in Curlew Valley, Utah, were extended to 28 years . . Ihat data sct includes intb~mat~on I dicating the u~-upt~on I jackrabbit numbers that peaked In 1980 subs~ded to vely low nun~bel-s by the mid-1 980s and was ~ollowed by another inuption in the early 1990s Coyote numbers, however, did not follow the an~lcipated patterns. When jackrabbit numbers dccllned in the mid1980s, coyote numbers remained h ~ g h Faced with explaining deviance from the cspected, 2 hypotheses were identified The first suggest~iig this resulted from a marked mcrease in the abundance of deer and antelope in Curlew Valley, pi-ovtd~ng an alternate winter food resource. The other hypothes~s involved lower mortality rates associated with reduced hunian exploitation result~ng 6-om lower fur pnces and a reduction in the ~ntensity of esploitat~on to protect domest~c stock. Although our current preference resides w ~ t h the first alternative and 1s conwstent with the food abundance hypothesis, no addit~onal data have been assembled to clarify the issues. On the other hand, Hamlin et al (1 989) reported that during a population decline of mule deer (Odocoileus hettriontts) In north-central Montana, coyotcs remained abundant. They hypothesized that coyote sul-v~val may have increased as a result of Increased abundance of microtme I-dents as an alternative food source. This was unlikely In Cui-lew Valley because m~ci-otines are not common (I-Iol'fiiian 1979). Othastudies have added to our understandings A companion study to the Curlew Valley research involved inonitoring rodent, lagomo~ph, and coyote populat~ons over a 12-yeaiperiod on the Idaho Nat~onal Engtneering Laboratoiy (INEL), a slte some 100 nl~les north of Curlew Valley and largely linrnune from puhlic access (Stoddart 1987). Data from this location are slmilar to those fi-om Curlew Valley, \vlth jackrahb~t populat~ons inupt~ng from exvemely low numbers In the late 1970s to over 280 per mi2 In 198 1 , and then returning to very low levels by the m ~ d 1980s Co~ncident w ~ t h the increase In hares, coyote abundance Increased 5fold, followed by a gradual decllne dter hares became scarce. This re~nfoi-ces previous interpretat~ons about the potential role of prey abundance In detennin~ng coyote abundance. One notable aspect of the INEL data is the relatively slo\v response In coyote abundance to the ab~upt decl~ne in a major food resource Two years after the jackrabb~t population I-etuined to vely low levels, the sprlng coyote dens~ty index was still 3 times pre-~n-uption levels. Todd et al. (1981) and Todd and Ke~th (1983) found that wlnter coyote abundance was ~II-ecily related to snowshoe hai-e abundance In their study, all demographic pal-anieters of coyotes measured declined as snocvshoe hares became scarce, leading them to bel~cve that lo\v ava~labll~ty of alternate prey In the boreal forest ~ntlrnately linked the coyote pollulat~on to tluctuat~ons in sno\\ishoe hare abundance. Based on an I l -yea]study in southel-n Texas, Windherg (1 995) prov~dcd data iiid~cat~ng coyote population growth was correlated positively with wlnter prey abundance and con-elated negatively w ~ t h ~n~ t i a l coyote abundance Since both prey and coyotcs were extremely abundant in the area (spring coyote populations estimated at 4-7 per mi2), the coyote population may have been approach~ng the upper lim~ts for density and other constraints may have also been operating This study is particularly notable in that ~t documents a negative relationsh~p between coyote abundance and populat~on growth. Although convict~ons that a relat~onsh~p between coyote abundance and prey abundance have been I-emforced in recent yeai-s, more definitive understandings of that relationship have not emerged Improved quantitative assessments of the abundance and availability of prey in relat~on to coyote density, along with the adoption of standardized methodology among studies are needed to provide more enlightenment. Long-term monlto~mg of predator and prey populations will be essential to clariry the Impacts and mechanism(s) link~ng predator and prey populations
منابع مشابه
Effects of Coyote Population Reduction on Swift Fox Demographics in Southeastern Colorado
The distribution and abundance of swift foxes (Vulpes velox) has declined from historic levels. Causes for the decline include habitat loss and fragmentation, incidental poisoning, changing land use practices, trapping, and predation by other carnivores. Coyotes (Canis latrans) overlap the geographical distribution of swift foxes, compete for similar resources, and are a significant source of m...
متن کاملA Perspective on the Genetic Composition of Eastern Coyotes
Way et al. (2010) defi ne a “coywolf” population in the northeastern United States and eastern Canada that originated through hybridization between Canis lycaon (Eastern Wolf) and Canis latrans (Coyote), but they maintain that it is now genetically uniform and only minimally infl uenced by either parental species. An alternative interpretation of available data is that this northeastern Coyote ...
متن کاملClimatic amplification of the numerical response of a predator population to its prey.
We evaluated evidence of an effect of climate on the numerical response of a coyote (Canis latrans) population to their keystone prey, snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), in a Canadian boreal forest. Six a priori hypotheses of the coyote numerical response were developed that postulated linear, nonlinear, additive, and interactive effects of prey and climate. Model selection procedures showed th...
متن کاملCoyote Control to Protect Endangered San Joaquin Kit Foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves, California
We investigated the effectiveness of a coyote (Canis latrans) control program implemented to increase numbers of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California (NPRC). Between 1980 and 1985, the kit fox population on NPRC declined approximately 66% while coyote abundance apparently increased. Coyote predation was identified as the primary...
متن کاملConfirmation of Coyote Predation on Adult Female White-tailed Deer in the Southeastern United States
The recent expansion of Canis latrans (Coyote) into the eastern United States has generated interest among wildlife managers because of the potential impacts on Odocoileus virginianus (White-tailed Deer) populations. Coyotes have been reported as predators of adult and neonate White-tailed Deer in some parts of their range, but recent studies in the Southeast have documented only Coyote predati...
متن کامل